Login/Logout

*
*  

ACA’s journal, Arms Control Today, remains the best in the market. Well focused. Solidly researched. Prudent.

– Hans Blix,
former IAEA Director-General

Daryl G. Kimball

Trump Considers Easing Nuclear Rules for Saudi Project

News Source: 
Bloomberg
News Date: 
December 12, 2017 -05:00

Posted: December 12, 2017

US ready for talks with North Korea 'without preconditions', Tillerson says

News Source: 
The Guardian
News Date: 
December 12, 2017 -05:00

Posted: December 12, 2017

US, Russia missile treaty in jeopardy as tensions escalate

News Source: 
Deutsche Welle
News Date: 
December 9, 2017 -05:00

Posted: December 10, 2017

Trump approves new Russia sanctions for violating Cold War arms pact

News Source: 
Politico
News Date: 
December 8, 2017 -05:00

Posted: December 10, 2017

U.S. and Russia Should Avoid Escalation and Commit to Resolve Lingering INF Treaty Dispute

Sections:

Description: 

Statement by Executive Director Daryl G. Kimball

Body: 

Statement by Executive Director Daryl G. Kimball

The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, which was signed 30 years ago today, eliminated an entire class of destabilizing U.S. and Soviet nuclear-armed weapons and helped end the Cold War. Although the INF Treaty is clearly in the security interests of the United States, Europe, and Russia, the treaty is in jeopardy.

Soviet inspectors and their American escorts stand among U.S. Pershing II missiles destroyed in accordance with the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in a photo taken January 14, 1989. (Photo credit: MSGT Jose Lopez Jr./U.S. Defense Department)

According the U.S. government, Russia has violated the INF Treaty by testing and subsequently deploying a small number of ground-launched cruise missiles (GLCMs) with a range between 500 and 5,500 km. Russia denies that it has violated the treaty and has instead raised its own concerns about U.S. compliance with the agreement. This is a serious matter.

Both sides say they support the INF Treaty, but they have not been able to resolve the compliance dispute through the Special Verification Commission (SVC), a technical forum designed to resolve compliance concerns. The U.S. side has requested a second meeting of the SVC on December 12-14 to address the matter once again. This is an important opportunity that both sides must use to bring forward additional details about their concerns, as well as discuss concrete and practical solutions, rather than only exchange complaints and vague allegations.

The Trump administration announced today that it is committed to the INF Treaty and to bringing Russia back into compliance, which is helpful. What is not helpful is its proposal to recommit to the treaty by taking steps that would put the United States on the path to violating it. The administration announced that it is pursuing a tit-for-tat response: the development of new, INF non-compliant conventional missile.

As long as Russia remains in noncompliance with the treaty, the United States should make clear it clear that Russia will not be allowed to gain a military advantage from its violation.

But a symmetric response won’t make the United States or Europe any safer and will only make the problem worse. Earlier this year, the Republican-led Congress opened the door to this escalation of the problem by authorizing a program of record for such a weapons system.

The INF Treaty does not prohibit research or development, but going down this road sets the stage for Washington to violate the agreement at some point and it takes the focus off of Russia’s INF violation. Rather than persuading Russia to return to compliance, this action is more likely to give Moscow an excuse to continue on its current course.

New ground-launched intermediate-range missiles are not needed to defend NATO or Northeast Asian allies. U.S. forces are already stocked with formidable air- and sea-launched missiles that can cover the same targets. Furthermore, a new U.S. INF missile would take years to develop and cost billions of dollars that would drain funding from other military programs.

Most importantly, NATO does not support a new missile, and no country has offered to host it. It is thus a missile to nowhere. If the Trump administration tries to force the alliance to accept a new, potentially nuclear missile it would divide the alliance.

Instead, both sides must recommit to resolve this issue and use the existing treaty compliance resolution mechanism, the SVC, to evaluate competing technical claims and ultimately to remove from deployment any INF systems in Russia that do not comply with the treaty.

In addition to working to preserve and strengthen the existing bilateral arms control architecture, including the INF Treaty, the U.S. and Russia should begin to discuss the future of the 2010 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, which can and should be extended for another five years. These agreements constrain Russia's nuclear forces and provide stability, predictability and transparency. They have only increased in value as the U.S.-Russia relationship has deteriorated.

 

Subject Resources:

Country Resources:

Posted: December 8, 2017

U.N. official’s visit to North Korea may set stage for talks on nuclear issue

News Source: 
The Japan Times
News Date: 
December 6, 2017 -05:00

Posted: December 7, 2017

Hiroshima Survivor Setsuko Thurlow Shares Her Wisdom with the Next Generation

(Updated from original version published July 6, 2017) One of the catalytic forces behind the pursuit and conclusion of the new Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in recent years has been the voices of the hibakusha, the survivors of the atomic bombings of the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as the people across the globe who have been adversely affected by more than seven decades of nuclear weapons production and testing. The preamble of the new prohibition treaty, which was opened for signature at UN headquarters in New York on September 20, notes “the unacceptable...

U.S. should respect its nuclear sanctions relief commitments: Kimball

News Source: 
The Tehran Times
News Date: 
December 4, 2017 -05:00

Posted: December 4, 2017

First Use of Nuclear Weapons Would be Counterproductive

News Source: 
Inter Press Service
News Date: 
December 1, 2017 -05:00

Posted: December 4, 2017

Daryl Kimball on North Korea's Nuclear Program

News Source: 
C-SPAN | Washington Journal
News Date: 
December 3, 2017 -05:00

Posted: December 4, 2017

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Daryl G. Kimball