Experts Available to Comment on Iran Nuclear Talks
For Immediate Release: May 16, 2012
(Washington, D.C.) Next week, diplomats from the P5+1 group of states (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States) will hold a second round of talks with senior Iranian officials in Baghdad to discuss the Iranian nuclear program. The May 23 round of negotiations are expected to focus on Iran's enrichment of uranium to 20 percent and improved cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency.
The April 14 round of talks with Iran in Istanbul established a good foundation for progress. Now the task is to reach agreement on specific, concrete proposals that can help prevent a nuclear-armed Iran, beginning with the most urgent proliferation problems.
Arms Control Association experts and other NGO experts will be available to comment on these developments over the next several days:
Daryl G. Kimball, Executive Director, ACA (202) 463-8270 x107.
Greg Thielmann, Senior Fellow, ACA (202) 463-8270 x103.
Mark Fitzpatrick, Director of the Nonproliferation and Disarmament Program, International Institute for Strategic Studies (London) +44 20-7379-7676.
Dr. James Walsh, Research Associate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Security Studies Program (617) 388-8200.
Additional Resources:
"U.S. Position on Iran Enrichment: More Public Recognition Than Policy Shift," ArmsControlNow, April 30, 2012.
"Iran Nuclear Talks: To Keep Global Support, U.S. Must Seize Diplomatic Opportunities," oped by Daryl G. Kimball, Christian Science Monitor, April 23, 2012.
"The IAEA Outlines the Path for Iran to Come Clean, But is Tehran Ready?," ACA Issue Brief, March 7, 2012.
"History of Official Proposals on the Iranian Nuclear Issue," ACA Fact Sheet, April 2012.
###
The Arms Control Association is an independent, membership-based organization dedicated to providing authoritative information and practical policy solutions to address the threats posed by the world's most dangerous weapons.
My Account
ACA In The News
Why Chemical Weapons Have Been A Red Line Since World War INational Public Radio
May 1, 2013
Building New Ballistic Missile Subs Could Demand Smaller Fleet, Navy Says
Global Security Newswire
May 1, 2013
Syria chemical weapons: Where did they come from?
The Christian Science Monitor
April 26, 2013
U.S. Gets "B-" for Anti-Nuclear Efforts
Global Security Newswire
April 25, 2013
US Gun Lobby Targets International Arms Treaty
Voice of America
April 25, 2013
Pentagon report on North Korea nuclear capabilities stirs worry, doubts
Reuters
April 12, 2013








