Pyroprocessing Is Reprocessing: U.S. Official
In what appears to be the
In March 29 remarks at a nuclear policy conference in
However, he said, electroreduction and electrorefining, the key elements of pyroprocessing, have “moved to the point that the product is dangerous from a proliferation point of view. So, for that reason, pyroprocessing is reprocessing, and that’s part of the problem.”
Previous public statements on pyroprocessing by the Bush and Obama administrations had indicated proliferation concerns about the technology, but had not been as unequivocal as
Pyroprocessing differs from PUREX (plutonium-uranium extraction) reprocessing, which has been used in nuclear energy and weapons programs around the world, because the plutonium separated from spent fuel by pyroprocessing remains mixed with other elements. South Korean officials have argued that this difference makes pyroprocessing more proliferation resistant than traditional reprocessing.
The current U.S.-South Korean nuclear cooperation agreement, which is due to expire in 2014, gives the
The two countries have agreed to sign a memorandum of understanding to conduct a 10-year joint feasibility study on pyroprocessing and other options for handling spent fuel. The study is to be conducted in parallel with negotiations on other aspects of nuclear cooperation.
My Account
ACA In The News
U.S. to Propose New Phase In Nuclear-Arms CutsThe Wall Street Journal
June 19, 2013
Analysis: Navy May Be Unable to Afford 12 Ballistic Missile Subs
Global Security Newswire
June 11, 2013
Cold War Turning Point: Fifty Years On
PBS
June 10, 2013
Historic Arms Trade Treaty Signed at U.N.
Inter Press Service
June 4, 2013
Kerry welcomes US signature of international gun control treaty at U.N.
Catholic Online
June 4, 2013
Op Ed | US signature needed to advance global arms trade treaty
The Hill
June 3, 2013








