U.S. Scientists Studied, Rejected Nukes in Vietnam
Christine Kucia
The U.S. government studied the feasibility of tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs) use during the Vietnam War and concluded that it “would offer the U.S. no military advantage commensurate with its political cost,” according to a recently declassified 1966 report that was released March 9.
JASON, a group of scientists that provides guidance to the U.S. government on military and arms control issues, conducted the study to assess the military and political consequences of unilateral U.S. TNW use in Southeast Asia, as well as the possible use of nuclear weapons against U.S. forces in the Vietnam conflict.
“Tactical Nuclear Weapons in South Asia” explored a variety of circumstances in which the weapons could be used against enemy forces, weighing the number of targets, the movement of enemy troops, and the impact of possible enemy support from China or the Soviet Union. It also assessed U.S. force vulnerability in the event of an enemy strike, concluding that U.S. military deployments would be severely compromised due to force density, troop location, and a lack of measures to protect bases.
The JASON study also warned of the possible proliferation consequences of TNW use in Southeast Asia, concluding, “Insurgent groups everywhere in the world would take note and would try by all available means to acquire TNWs for themselves.”
Touching on the political consequences of first use of TNWs in Vietnam, the study suggested that the United States would face a severe backlash of public opinion worldwide. The scientists acknowledged, “In sum, the political effects of U.S. first use of TNW in Vietnam would be uniformly bad and could be catastrophic.”
The report emerged publicly as the Bush administration contemplates new nuclear weapons development. In November 2002, Congress authorized the administration’s request to conduct a three-year research project on a robust nuclear earth penetrating nuclear weapon, which could defeat hardened and deeply buried targets. (See ACT, December 2002.) Most recently, the Pentagon requested the repeal of 1993 legislation prohibiting research and development of low-yield nuclear weapons. (See ACT, April 2003.)
<!--#include virtual="/linked/foot.inc"-->
My Account
ACA Delivers A Lot on a Modest Budget
ACA In The News
Hill resolution could harm diplomatic efforts, critics sayPolitico
February 9, 2012
New push to remove tactical nuclear weapons from Europe
The Guardian
February 3, 2012
Israeli Army Chief Says Nation Needs to Build Up Military to Strike Iran
Bloomberg
February 1, 2012
US Weapons For Future Include Key Relics Of Past
Associated Press
January 28, 2012
Arms Control Proponents Question U.S. Nuclear Readiness Doctrine
Global Security Newswire
January 24, 2012
West sceptical of Iranian nuclear cooperation
Reuters
January 13, 2012







