U.S., Uzbekistan Sign Threat Reduction Agreement
Philipp C. Bleek
The United States signed an agreement June 5 with Uzbekistan that, according to Bush administration officials, will provide a “legal framework” for a range of cooperative threat reduction and military activities.
Signed by Secretary of State Colin Powell and Uzbek Foreign Minister Abdulaziz Kamilov in Washington, the accord is intended to facilitate three specific projects, according to the officials. Most notably, it will allow work on eliminating a biological weapons complex located on Vozrozhdeniye (“Renaissance”) Island in the Aral Sea.
The island contains an extensive, well-documented Soviet-era complex, which one official estimated contains “more than 80 buildings.” U.S. officials plan to eliminate the complex’s facilities and to destroy residual stocks of biological weapons, including anthrax, currently stored there.
The project has some urgency because diversion of water for agricultural purposes has drastically lowered the Aral Sea’s water level. Some experts warn that land bridges could soon form between the island and the mainland, providing a conduit for animals to carry anthrax spores or other biological agents from the island.
The agreement will also facilitate work already underway under a pre-existing accord to dismantle a chemical weapons research facility located at Nukus. Furthermore, the agreement will permit Uzbek participation in a Defense Department biological material protection and control program that aims to enhance the security of pathogen collections at research facilities.
In addition, the accord provides a legal umbrella for possible future threat reduction cooperation, such as work between the Energy Department and the Uzbek government on enhanced safeguards for the country’s nuclear research reactor. This umbrella will also extend to defense and military contacts, such as joint military exercises.
According to the official, the agreement entered into force upon signing, superceding an existing “ministry-to-ministry agreement” between the two countries’ defense departments. It will expire in seven years. The official emphasized that more narrowly targeted implementing agreements must still be negotiated for each project, although the Nukus activities can proceed under an existing implementing agreement.
My Account
ACA In The News
Letter to the Editor | Getting a global, nuclear NavyWashington Post
May 5, 2013
Why Chemical Weapons Have Been A Red Line Since World War I
National Public Radio
May 1, 2013
Building New Ballistic Missile Subs Could Demand Smaller Fleet, Navy Says
Global Security Newswire
May 1, 2013
Syria chemical weapons: Where did they come from?
The Christian Science Monitor
April 26, 2013
U.S. Gets "B-" for Anti-Nuclear Efforts
Global Security Newswire
April 25, 2013
US Gun Lobby Targets International Arms Treaty
Voice of America
April 25, 2013








