U.S. and Soviet/Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces
Under the treaty, the five parties semiannually exchange memorandum of understanding (MOU) data providing numbers, types, and locations of accountable strategic nuclear weapons and their associated delivery vehicles. The tables below compare the number of START-accountable deployed warheads declared in the initial September 1990 MOU with data from the January 2000 MOU, demonstrating the progress the parties have made in nuclear force reductions to date. —For more information, contact Philipp C. Bleek.
U.S. Strategic Forces:
Warheads by Delivery System1
| September 1990 | January 2000 | |
| ICBMs | ||
| MX | 500 | 500 |
| Minuteman III | 1,500 | 1,908 |
| Minuteman II | 450 | 1 |
| Total | 2,450 | 2,409 |
| SLBMs | ||
| Poseidon (C-3) | 1,920 | 320 |
| Trident I (C-4) | 3,072 | 1,536 |
| Trident II (D-5) | 768 | 1,920 |
| Total | 5,760 | 3,776 |
| Bombers | ||
| B-52 (ALCM) | 1,968 | 1,420 |
| B-52 (Non-ALCM) | 290 | 47 |
| B-1 | 95 | 91 |
| B-2 | 0 | 20 |
| Total | 2,353 | 1,578 |
| Total Warheads | 10,563 | 7,763 |
Soviet/Russian Strategic Forces:
Warheads by Delivery System1
| September 19902 | January 20003 | |
| ICBMs | ||
| SS-11 | 326 | 0 |
| SS-13 | 40 | 0 |
| SS-17 | 188 | 0 |
| SS-18 | 3,080 | 1,800 |
| SS-19 | 1,800 | 900 |
| SS-24 (silo) | 560 | 100 |
| SS-24 (rail) | 330 | 360 |
| SS-25 | 288 | 360 |
| SS-27 (silo)4 | — | 20 |
| SS-27 (road)4 | — | 0 |
| Total | 6,612 | 3,540 |
| SLBMs | ||
| SS-N-6 | 192 | 0 |
| SS-N-8 | 280 | 64 |
| SS-N-17 | 12 | 0 |
| SS-N-18 | 672 | 624 |
| SS-N-20 | 1,200 | 1,200 |
| SS-N-23 | 448 | 448 |
| Total | 2,804 | 2,336 |
| Bombers | ||
| Bear (ALCM) | 672 | 528 |
| Bear (Non-ALCM) | 63 | 4 |
| Blackjack | 120 | 64 |
| Total | 855 | 596 |
| Total Warheads | 10,271 | 6,472 |
Strategic Forces on Non-Russian Territory1
| Belarus | Kazakhstan | Ukraine | |
| ICBMs | 0 | 0 | 270 (SS-24) |
| SLBMs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bombers | 0 | 0 | 136 (Bear) 120 (Blackjack) |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 526 |
NOTES
1. Warhead attributions are based on START I counting rules. This results in bombers having fewer warheads attributed to them than they actually carry. Even though all nuclear warheads from Ukraine have been transported to Russia, they remain START-accountable until their associated delivery systems have been destroyed. [Back to Table 1 , 2 or 3]2. Includes weapons in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine. [Back to Table]
3. Weapons in Russia only. [Back to Table]
4. Also known as the TOPOL-M or RS-12M Variant 2 ICBM. [Back to Table]
Sources: START I Memorandum of Understanding, September 1, 1990; START I Memorandum of Understanding, January 31, 2000; ACA.
<!--#include virtual="/linked/foot.inc"-->
My Account
ACA Delivers A Lot on a Modest Budget
ACA In The News
Hill resolution could harm diplomatic efforts, critics sayPolitico
February 9, 2012
New push to remove tactical nuclear weapons from Europe
The Guardian
February 3, 2012
Israeli Army Chief Says Nation Needs to Build Up Military to Strike Iran
Bloomberg
February 1, 2012
US Weapons For Future Include Key Relics Of Past
Associated Press
January 28, 2012
Arms Control Proponents Question U.S. Nuclear Readiness Doctrine
Global Security Newswire
January 24, 2012
West sceptical of Iranian nuclear cooperation
Reuters
January 13, 2012







