U.S. and Soviet/Russian Strategic Forces
—For more information, contact ACA.
U.S. Strategic Forces:
Warheads by Delivery System1
| September 1990 | January 1997 | |
| ICBMs | ||
| MX | 500 | 500 |
| Minuteman III | 1,500 | 1,770 |
| Minuteman II | 450 | 115 |
| Total | 2,450 | 2,385 |
| SLBMs | ||
| Poseidon (C-3) | 1,920 | 320 |
| Trident I (C-4) | 3,072 | 1,664 |
| Trident II (D-5) | 768 | 1,920 |
| Total | 5,760 | 3,904 |
| Bombers | ||
| B-52 (ALCM) | 1,968 | 1,656 |
| B-52 (Non-ALCM) | 290 | 56 |
| B-1 | 95 | 93 |
| B-2 | 0 | 17 |
| Total | 2,353 | 1,822 |
| Total Warheads | 10,563 | 8,111 |
Soviet/Russian Strategic Forces:
Warheads by Delivery System1
| September 19902 | January 19973 | |
| ICBMs | ||
| SS-11 | 326 | 0 |
| SS-13 | 40 | 0 |
| SS-17 | 188 | 0 |
| SS-18 | 3,080 | 1,860 |
| SS-19 | 1,800 | 1,020 |
| SS-24 silo | 560 | 100 |
| SS-24 rail | 330 | 360 |
| SS-25 | 288 | 360 |
| Total | 6,612 | 3,700 |
| SLBMs | ||
| SS-N-6 | 192 | 16 |
| SS-N-8 | 280 | 208 |
| SS-N-17 | 12 | 0 |
| SS-N-18 | 672 | 624 |
| SS-N-20 | 1,200 | 1,200 |
| SS-N-23 | 448 | 448 |
| Total | 2,804 | 2,496 |
| Bombers | ||
| Bear (ALCM) | 672 | 504 |
| Bear (Non-ALCM) | 63 | 10 |
| Blackjack | 120 | 48 |
| Total | 855 | 562 |
| Total Warheads | 10,271 | 6,758 |
Strategic Forces on Non-Russian Territory1
| Belarus | Kazakhstan | Ukraine | |
| ICBMs | 0 | 0 | 414 (SS-19) 460 (SS-24) |
| SLBMs | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bombers | 0 | 0 | 200 (Bear) 152 (Blackjack) |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1,226 |
NOTES
1. Warhead attributions are based on START I counting rules. This results in bombers having fewer warheads attributed to them than they actually carry. On the other hand, even though all nuclear warheads from Ukraine have been removed to Russia, they remain START-accountable until the delivery systems have been destroyed. [Back to Table 1 , 2 or 3]
2. Includes weapons in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine. [Back to Table]
3. Weapons in Russia only. [Back to Table]
Sources: START I Memorandum of Understanding, January 1, 1997; ACA.
My Account
ACA In The News
Letter to the Editor | Getting a global, nuclear NavyWashington Post
May 5, 2013
Why Chemical Weapons Have Been A Red Line Since World War I
National Public Radio
May 1, 2013
Building New Ballistic Missile Subs Could Demand Smaller Fleet, Navy Says
Global Security Newswire
May 1, 2013
Syria chemical weapons: Where did they come from?
The Christian Science Monitor
April 26, 2013
U.S. Gets "B-" for Anti-Nuclear Efforts
Global Security Newswire
April 25, 2013
US Gun Lobby Targets International Arms Treaty
Voice of America
April 25, 2013








