Preventive Military Action: The Worst Way to Deal With Iran's Nuclear Program
June 18, 2009
Click here to download the full Threat Assessment Brief (PDF).
Although the possibility of Iranian nuclear weapons is a major concern for Israel and the United States, leaving the "military option" on the table is counterproductive. Preventive military action by either country against Iran's nuclear facilities would only delay, rather than halt, Tehran's nuclear program, and it would cause Iran to retaliate against the United States as well as Israel. The aftermath of such an attack would be disastrous for the U.S.position in the region-particularly for relations with Israel and with Iraq-and its position in the wider world.
My Account
ACA In The News
Humanitarian Groups Push For ‘Bulletproof’ Arms TreatyBloomberg
May 24, 2012
Nuclear talks begin in Baghdad, a day after U.N. watchdog says deal with Iran is near
The Washington Post
May 23, 2012
Arms Control Groups Accuse NATO of Keeping Nuclaer Status Quo
Global Security Newswire
May 22, 2012
The Iranian nuclear facilities that could lead to war
Wired.co.uk
May 22, 2012
Engaging Russia in NATO Missile Defense
The Epoch Times
May 21, 2012
Opposition to Iranian Nuclear Arms Widespread: Global Poll
Inter Press Service
May 21, 2012







