Weapons Research & Development
-
Arms Control TodayMarch 1, 2007
-
Arms Control TodayJanuary 1, 2007
For years, some scientists and policymakers have worried that the reliability of U.S. nuclear warheads could diminish as their plutonium components age. Such concerns have led some to argue the United States should resume nuclear testing, rebuild its older warheads, or both. Most recently, plutonium aging has been used by the Bush administration to justify an ambitious new proposal for remaking the weapons complex and the nuclear arsenal.
Think again. A new set of government studies finds that the plutonium primaries, or pits, of most U.S. nuclear weapons “will have minimum lifetimes of at least 85 years,” which is about twice as long as previous official estimates. The findings have led the National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) to admit that “the degradation of plutonium in our nuclear weapons will not affect warhead reliability for decades.” (Continue)
-
Arms Control TodayJanuary 1, 2007
-
Arms Control TodayMay 1, 2006
-
Documents & ReportsApril 25, 2006
-
Arms Control TodayMarch 1, 2006
-
Documents & ReportsJanuary 25, 2006
-
About ACAJanuary 1, 2006
-
Arms Control TodayDecember 1, 2005
-
Arms Control TodayJuly 1, 2005
My Account
ACA In The News
Iran Seeks to Speed Up Nuclear Activity: IAEAThe New York Times
May 23, 2013
Iran pushes ahead with nuclear plant that worries West
Reuters
May 22, 2013
Report: North Korea launches fourth short-range missile
CNN
May 19, 2013
Syria's Chemical Weapons Vulnerable as Conflict Widens
Voice of America
May 10, 2013
Reports of Chemical Weapons Use in Syria Murky
Voice of America
May 10, 2013
Letter to the Editor | Getting a global, nuclear Navy
Washington Post
May 5, 2013








