Corrections
<!-- #include virtual="/linked/head.inc" -->• William Burr’s “The Limits of Limited Nuclear War,” in the January/February issue of Arms Control Today incorrectly described the smallest nuclear option in current U.S. military war plans as an attack with 150 nuclear weapons. The relevant sentence on p. 44 should have read, “In the following years, however, U.S. war plans began to provide for truly small limited options; they now range between 2 and 120 nuclear weapons, close to what Nixon-era policymakers were seeking.”
• A headline on p. 21 of the same issue was inaccurate. The headline mischaracterized an article by Alexander Glaser and Frank von Hippel about the debate over ending the use of highly enriched uranium (HEU) in medical-isotope production. The article should have been entitled “Ending HEU Use in Medical-Isotope Production.”
<!-- #include virtual="/linked/foot.inc" -->
My Account
ACA Delivers A Lot on a Modest Budget
Click here to learn more about ACA and why the MacArthur Foundation recognized us as one of the most "creative and effective" nonprofit organizations in the world.
ACA In The News
Hill resolution could harm diplomatic efforts, critics sayPolitico
February 9, 2012
New push to remove tactical nuclear weapons from Europe
The Guardian
February 3, 2012
Israeli Army Chief Says Nation Needs to Build Up Military to Strike Iran
Bloomberg
February 1, 2012
US Weapons For Future Include Key Relics Of Past
Associated Press
January 28, 2012
Arms Control Proponents Question U.S. Nuclear Readiness Doctrine
Global Security Newswire
January 24, 2012
West sceptical of Iranian nuclear cooperation
Reuters
January 13, 2012







