 |
Army Report Details Patriot Record in Iraq War
A
new Army report reaffirms earlier Pentagon claims that the Patriot
missile defense system destroyed all Iraqi missiles that it engaged
during the invasion of Iraq, but does not fully account for why
the system failed to target several other Iraqi missiles fired at
U.S. forces and Kuwait. The report also describes several operational
challenges to the system’s performance that emerged in the
buildup to and unfolding of the conflict.
The 32nd Army Air and Missile Defense Command, which is charged
with protecting U.S. ground forces from air and missile attacks,
recently released its account of “Operation Iraqi Freedom.”
As part of that history, the command reports that the Patriot missile
defense system, which is designed to destroy short- and medium-range
ballistic missiles, scored a perfect nine for nine in intercepting
Iraqi missiles. Colonel Charles Anderson, chief of staff of the
command, wrote, “The critics concerns over Patriot lethality
should be forever silenced.”
Yet Iraq fired at least 23 ballistic and cruise missiles, according
to the report, during the three-week span it took U.S. forces to
fight their way to Baghdad and topple Saddam Hussein’s regime.
Of the 14 Iraqi missiles not engaged by Patriots, four were reported
as outside the range of any Patriot system and one exploded shortly
after launch. No official explanation is given for why the other
nine Iraqi missiles were not fired upon, though the report implied
that at least three might have been because their trajectories were
judged to be non-threatening.
Patriots also did not down any Iraqi cruise missiles, which are
powered for their whole flight, can maneuver, and fly at low altitudes.
Due to these flight characteristics, a cruise missile can be difficult
for radars to track or confused with aircraft.
Although dismissing several Iraqi cruise missile attacks that caused
no casualties as ineffective, the report acknowledged, “continued
[cruise missile] attacks may have forced us to change our tactics.”
The report later added that “the ability of these older cruise
missiles to penetrate friendly airspace and reach their targets
should serve as a warning…that the emerging cruise missile
threat must be addressed.”
The other Iraqi missile that presented a special challenge was the
short-range FROG-7 missile. Because of their brief flight times,
the missiles must be detected and engaged within roughly 90 seconds,
forcing Patriot commanders to make rapid firing decisions. The report
recommended that the Army consider putting more senior officers
in charge of Patriot batteries in the future to ensure effective
decision-making.
Iraq did not launch any Scud missiles, which an earlier version
of the Patriot had little success against in the 1991 Persian Gulf
War. Originally built by the Soviet Union and sold prolifically,
Scuds are aging, short-range ballistic missiles capable of carrying
a several hundred kilogram payload.
The report also pointed out difficulties in getting the Patriot
systems up and running. The Iraqis, who waited to fire any missiles
at U.S. forces until after the invasion started, might have caught
U.S. forces unprepared to use Patriots if they had attacked earlier.
Up until just two days before the U.S. invasion began, Patriot radar
systems were regularly malfunctioning due to the harsh environmental
conditions. Raytheon, the Patriot manufacturer, sent engineers out
to the field to get the systems working properly.
Once hostilities commenced, another problem arose. Due to the enormous
amount of electronic equipment involved in the fast-moving battle,
there was, in the report’s term, “cluttered cyberspace.”
Electronic signals interfered with each other, creating confusion
for radars and communication systems. The report said this could
have contributed to one Patriot’s mistaken intercept of a U.S.
fighter aircraft. Another Patriot destroyed a British jet.
An analysis should be done on battlefield electromagnetic interference
and new tactics and techniques should be created to deal with the
problem, the report recommended. It further stated that these should
be “applicable to the environment in the Korean Theater of
Operations.” The United States is currently in a standoff with
North Korea over its pursuit of nuclear weapons, and roughly 37,000
U.S. troops are stationed in South Korea. These forces are equipped
with Patriots.
Although Patriots are mobile and some moved forward with U.S. troops
into Iraq, the report stressed that the system should be better
designed to operate “cross-country” or off-road. “Since
the armed forces of the United States are now an offensive force
(as opposed to the Cold War, defense of Europe orientation) it is
imperative that Patriot become more mobile and able to sustain maneuver
over time,” the report concluded.
U.S. forces possess three versions of Patriot missiles. The newest
is the Patriot Advanced Capability-3, which accounted for two of
the nine Iraqi missile kills.
The Army Inspector General is also conducting a study on the Patriot’s
performance and U.S. Central Command is investigating the two friendly-fire
incidents.
|
