 |
Deconstructed: Kay's Congressional Testimony
Biological Weapons
David Kay, chief U.S. weapons inspector, told Congress that Iraq
after 1996 further compartmentalized its program and focused on
maintaining smaller, covert capabilities that could be activated
quickly to surge the production of [biological weapons] agents
and that Iraq concealed relevant equipment and materials
from UN inspectors in violation of Security Council Resolution 1441.
His most prominent piece of evidence, however, was that an Iraqi
scientist hid a vial of live C. botulinum Okra B. from which
a biological agent can be produced in his home; Kay later
acknowledged that the vial had been hidden in the scientists
home since 1993. Kay also said that a very large body of information
has been developed
that confirms Iraqs concealment
efforts, but he did not elaborate.
Additionally, Kay said the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) has not
yet been able to corroborate the existence of a mobile [biological
weapons] production effort and that the groups investigation
into two trailers discovered last spring is so far inconclusive.
A May CIA report claimed that the two trailers were for producing
biological weapons, apparently vindicating the administrations
prewar claims that Iraq possessed such mobile production units.
The Department of State, however, has expressed doubts about the
trailers purpose.
The ISG also found that:
· Iraqi scientists experimented with nonpathogenic
organisms serving as surrogates for prohibited investigation with
pathogenic agents. For example, they conducted experiments
with a substitute for anthrax that would have been directly
applicable to producing anthrax for weapons.
· Iraqi officials working to prepare for UN inspections
were explicitly ordered not to declare a prison laboratory
complex that was possibly used in human testing of biological
weapons agents.
· New research was being conducted on biological-weapon
applicable agents, Brucella and Congo Crimean Hemorrhagic Fever,
and that continuing work on ricin and aflatoxin were not declared
to the UN.
· Iraq never declared a clandestine network of laboratories
and facilities within the security service apparatus. The
network was suitable for preserving [biological weapons]
expertise, [biological weapons] capable facilities and continuing
R&D [research and development]all key elements for maintaining
a capability for resuming biological weapons production.
The ISG is still working on determining the extent to which
this network was tied to large-scale military efforts or
weapons.
Chemical Weapons
Iraq did not have a large, ongoing, centrally controlled
chemical weapons program after 1991. Information found to date suggests
that Iraqs large-scale capability to develop, produce, and
fill new [chemical weapons] munitions was reducedif not entirely
destroyedduring Operations Desert Storm and Desert Fox, 13
years of UN sanctions, and UN inspections.
Still, the ISG has developed multiple sources that indicate
that Iraq explored the possibility of chemical weapons production
in recent years, possibly as late as 2003.
Nuclear Weapons
Iraqi scientists and senior government officials told
the ISG that Saddam Hussein remained firmly committed to acquiring
nuclear weapons and assert that Saddam would have resumed
nuclear weapons development at some future point, perhaps
after Iraq was free of sanctions. In 2000, Iraq began
several small and relatively unsophisticated dual-use research initiatives,
but the ISG has no evidence that the research was applied to weapons
production.
The ISG has not uncovered evidence that Iraq undertook significant
post-1998 steps to actually build nuclear weapons or produce fissile
material although Iraq did take steps to preserve some
technological capability from the pre-1991 nuclear weapons program.
These steps include directing scientists to perform work to preserve
the science base and core skills that would be needed for any future
fissile material production or nuclear weapons development.
The ISG has found indications that there was interest, beginning
in 2002, in reconstituting a centrifuge enrichment program.
Several [Iraqi] scientistsat the direction of senior
Iraqi government officialspreserved documents and equipment
from their pre-1991 nuclear weapon-related research and did not
reveal them to the UN. These items would have been useful
for uranium-enrichment programs, according to Kay.
Delivery Systems
Missiles
Kays statement indicates that Iraq was conducting R&D
on several different missile projects designed to produce missiles
with ranges exceeding the 150 km permitted under Security Council
resolutions. Kay told reporters Oct. 2 that the ISG is still trying
to determine whether the missiles were intended to carry conventional
or weapons of mass destruction (WMD) payloads.
UN weapons inspectors ordered Iraq to destroy its al Samoud missiles,
which Iraq declared to the UN in December 2002, in February 2003
because the missiles exceeded the permitted range. Baghdad was in
the process of doing so when the invasion began.
Kay cited several Iraqi missile programs:
· Beginning in 1999, Iraq attempted to acquire technology
from North Korea for surface-to-surface missiles with a
range of 1,300 km
and land-to-sea missiles with a range of
300 km. No such transfers actually occurred.
· [S]ources told ISG that, beginning in 2000,
Hussein ordered the development of ballistic missiles with
ranges of at least 400 km and up to 1,000 km. These projects
appeared to include liquid and solid propellant missiles. Work
on the former had [apparently] progressed to a point to
support initial prototype production of some parts and assemblies.
It is unclear as to whether work on the latter had progressed
past the design phase.
· [T]estimony from missile designers indicates
that Iraq
reinitiated work on converting SA-2 Surface-to-Air
Missiles into ballistic missiles with a range goal of about 250
km. Engineering work was reportedly underway in early 2003, despite
the presence of [the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and
Inspection Commission].
· Kay said Iraq had two cruise missile programs. The first
was to increase the range of its HY-2 coastal-defense cruise missile
from 100 km to 150-180 km, according to multiple sources
of testimony
corroborated in part by a captured document.
Iraq produced 10 of these missiles, and two were fired during
the invasion. The second, aimed at converting the same missile
into a land-attack cruise missile with a 1,000 km range, began
in 2001, but Iraq halted engine development and testing
and disassembled the test stand in late 2002 before the design
criteria had been met.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)
According to Iraqi officials, Iraq had several UAV programs. A
prototype of one flew well beyond its permitted range during a 2002
test flight. However, Kay said that whether these vehicles were
intended to deliver WMD remains an open question.
Iraq had such a program before the 1991 Persian Gulf War, and UN
inspectors were still investigating the matter as of the March 2003
invasion.
Inspectors' Difficulties
Kay said the ISG has faced difficulties performing its work:
· Iraq engaged in systematic sanitization of documentary
and computer evidence in a wide range of offices, laboratories,
and companies suspected of WMD work. The pattern of these efforts
to erase evidencehard drives destroyed, specific files burned,
equipment cleaned of all traces of useare ones of deliberate,
rather than random, acts.
· Iraqi officials dispersed material and documentation
related to weapons programs and may have taken evidence
and
weapons-related materials to other countries.
· Both ISG personnel and knowledgeable Iraqis are subject
to safety threats. For example, Kay stated that ISG facilities
and personnel were attacked three times in September alone and
told FOX News Sunday Oct. 5 that one scientist was assassinated
the same day he spoke to ISG inspectors.
· Iraq undertook extensive concealment efforts, such as
co-locating unmarked chemical ordnance with large stocks of conventional
munitions.
|