Senate Approves NATO Expansion For Seven New Members
Wade Boese
What a difference five years makes. The last time the U.S. Senate
weighed extending NATO membership to new countries in 1998, senators
debated for four days about how Russia might respond and how much
adding new members might cost. But no such concerns marked the debate
preceding the Senates unanimous May 8 vote endorsing alliance
membership for seven additional countries.
With the foreign ministers of the seven candidate countries looking
on from the Senate balcony, senators by a 96-0 vote approved the
expansion of the 19-member alliance to include Bulgaria, Estonia,
Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. In 1998 the
Senate backed the memberships of the Czech Republic, Hungary, and
Poland by an 80-19 vote.
This latest expansion moved the alliance even further east toward
Russia and, for the first time, included countries that were part
of the former Soviet UnionEstonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.
Yet, Moscow barely batted an eyelash, unlike the previous round
when it protested vehemently. The Kremlins subdued response
to the growth of its Cold War-era foe reflects in part its warming
relations with the West and the May 2002 creation of the NATO-Russia
Council, which cemented a closer, more formal NATO-Russia relationship.
Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania also soothed Russian concerns by
pledging to accede to an updated version of the Conventional Armed
Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty once it enters into force. Moscow
had repeatedly stated over the last few years that the three countries
should not be admitted to NATO without being parties to the CFE
Treaty, which limits the amount and location of heavy weaponry,
such as tanks, that its states-parties can deploy.
Russias mollified stance was reflected in the Senate debate.
In 1998, several senators warned that NATOs expansion would
end rapprochement between Russia and the West and lead Moscow to
increase its reliance on nuclear forces. This time, no senator voiced
such worries. In fact, Russia was barely mentioned.
Instead, senators indicated that they are more concerned about
problems posed to NATO from within rather than from outside. Several
senators, led by Carl Levin (D-MI) and John Warner (R-VA), expressed
concern that as the alliance grows it will become harder for the
alliance to act because it makes decisions by consensus. Senator
Jim Jeffords (I-VT) made the strongest statement, declaring, I
am concerned that the alliance has expanded to the point of becoming
inefficient and unwieldy.
Reflecting these concerns, the Senate passed a nonbinding amendment
calling on the president to initiate a discussion at NATO on the
consensus decision-making rule.
Underlying this Senate initiative, in part, was lingering resentment
over the failure of some NATO members to stand firmly with the United
States in confronting Iraq over its disarmament. Belgium, France,
and Germany strongly opposed U.S.-led military action against Iraq,
and Turkey did not grant the United States the use of Turkish territory
for launching a northern invasion.
The amendment also called for the president to raise the merits
of creating a process for suspending a countrys alliance membership
if it no longer complies with NATO principles of democracy,
individual liberty, and the rule of law. The process would
potentially be applied to a country that became a dictatorship.
The amendment does not specify a U.S. position on either the consensus
rule or the suspension issue but only suggests they be brought up
for discussion.
Some senators acknowledged that the seven aspiring countries will
not contribute much military manpower or might to the alliance,
but they expressed confidence that the countries would be able to
fill capability niches, such as detecting weapons of mass destruction
and demining. They also said they hope the new members will reinvigorate
the spirit of the alliance as a club of free-market democracies.
All NATOs existing members must approve the seven countries
bids to join the alliance. The United States was the third country
to do so, following Canada and Norway. All NATO members agreed last
November to extend invitations to the seven countries to join, and
they are all expected to approve the seven states accession.
The Senate also declared that NATOs door remains open and
that these seven will not be the last. Albania, Croatia,
and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia have applied for NATO
membership.
|