New Proposals on Iraq Introduced at the UN
| On February 24, 2003, key UN Security
Council members submitted competing proposals for dealing with
Iraq's failure to disarm, following reports from UN inspectors
that indicated Iraq is improving cooperation in some areas but
has failed so far to satisfactorily comply with UN resolutions.
The United Kingdom introduced a draft resolution, co-signed
by the United States and Spain, that many diplomats and analysts
have seen as a step toward war against Iraq. The resolution
says Iraq has submitted "false statements" and "failed
to take the final opportunity afforded to it by resolution
1441," through which the council provided Iraq a final
chance to disarm. Resolution 1441 says Iraq will "face
serious consequences" if it fails to comply with its
disarmament obligations.
On the same day, Russia and France submitted a memorandum
that says military action against Iraq "should only be
a last resort" and that to date "the conditions
for using force against Iraq are not fulfilled." The
memorandum, which also has China's support, says there is
no evidence to prove Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction
and calls for measures to strengthen inspections, such as
increasing the number of inspectors. (See
ACT, March 2003.)
|
Following is the text of the documents:
Draft Resolution by the United Kingdom, the United States, and
Spain
February 24, 2003
The Security Council,
PP1: Recalling all its previous relevant resolutions,
in particular its resolutions 661 (1990) of August 1990, 678 (1990)
of 29 November 1990, 686 (1991) of 2 March 1991, 687 (1991) of 3
April 1991, 688 (1991) of 5 April 1991, 707 (1991) of 15 August
1991, 715 (1991) of 11 October 1991, 986 (1995) of 14 April 1995,
1284 (1999) of 17 December 1999 and 1441 (2002) of 8 November 2002,
and all the relevant statements of its President,
PP2: Recalling that in its resolution 687 (1991) the
Council declared that a ceasefire would be based on acceptance by
Iraq of the provisions of that resolution, including the obligations
on Iraq contained therein,
PP3: Recalling that its resolution 1441 (2002), while
deciding that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its
obligations, afforded Iraq a final opportunity to comply with its
disarmament obligations under relevant resolutions,
PP4: Recalling that in its resolution 1441 (2002)
the Council decided that false statements or omissions in the declaration
submitted by Iraq pursuant to that resolution and failure by Iraq
at any time to comply with, and co-operate fully in the implementation
of, that resolution, would constitute a further material breach,
PP5: Noting, in that context, that in its resolution
1441 (2002), the Council recalled that it has repeatedly warned
Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued
violations of its obligations,
PP6: Noting that Iraq has submitted a declaration
pursuant to its resolution 1441 (2002) containing false statements
and omissions and has failed to comply with, and co-operate fully
in the implementation of, that resolution,
PP7: Reaffirming the commitment of all Member States
to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Iraq, Kuwait, and
the neighboring States,
PP8: Mindful of its primary responsibility under the
Charter of the United Nations for the maintenance of international
peace and security,
PP9: Recognizing the threat Iraqs non-compliance
with Council resolutions and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
and long-range missiles poses to international peace and security,
PP10: Determined to secure full compliance with its
decisions and to restore international peace and security in the
area,
PP11: Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the
United Nations,
OP1: Decides that Iraq has failed to take the final
opportunity afforded to it by resolution 1441 (2002);
OP2: Decides to remain seized of the matter.
Source: United States Mission to the United Nations
Memorandum from France and Russia
February 24, 2003
1. Full and effective disarmament in accordance with the relevant
UNSC resolutions remains the imperative objective of the international
community. Our priority should be to achieve this peacefully through
the inspection regime. The military option should only be a last
resort. So far, the conditions for using force against Iraq are
not fulfilled:
- While suspicions remain, no evidence has been given that Iraq
still possesses weapons of mass destruction or capabilities in
this field;
- Inspections have just reached their full pace; they are functioning
without hindrance; they have already produced results;
- While not yet fully satisfactory, Iraqi co-operation is improving,
as mentioned by the chief inspectors in their last report.
2. The Security Council must step up its efforts to give a real
chance to the peaceful settlement of the crisis. In this context,
the following conditions are of paramount importance:
- the unity of the Security Council must be preserved;
- the pressure that is put on Iraq must be increased.
3. These conditions can be met, and our common objectivethe
verifiable disarmament of Iraqcan be reached through the implementation
of the following proposals:
A. Clear program of action for the inspections:
According to resolution 1284, UNMOVIC and IAEA have to submit
their program of work for approval of the Council. The presentation
of this program of work should be speeded up, in particular the
key remaining disarmament tasks to be completed by Iraq pursuant
to its obligations to comply with the disarmament requirements
of resolution 687 (1991) and other related resolutions.
The key remaining tasks shall be defined according to their degree
of priority. What is required of Iraq for implementation of each
task shall be clearly defined and precise.
Such a clear identification of tasks to be completed will oblige
Iraq to cooperate more actively. It will also provide a clear
means for the Council to assess the co-operation of Iraq.
B. Reinforced inspections:
Resolution 1441 established an intrusive and reinforced system
of inspections. In this regard, all possibilities have not yet
been explored. Further measures to strengthen inspections could
include, as exemplified in the French non paper previously communicated
to the chief inspectors, the following: increase and diversification
of staff an expertise; establishment of mobile units designed
in particular to check on trucks; completion of the new system
of aerial surveillance; systematic processing of data provided
by the newly established system of aerial surveillance.
C. Timelines for inspections and assessment:
Within the framework of resolution 1284 and 1441, the implementation
of the program of work shall be sequenced according to a realistic
and rigorous timeline:
- the inspectors should be asked to submit the program of work
outlining the key substantive tasks for Iraq to accomplish,
including missiles / delivery systems, chemical weapons / precursors,
biological weapons / material and nuclear weapons in the context
of the report due March 1st;
- the chief inspectors shall report to the Council on implementation
of the program of work on a regular basis (every 3 weeks);
- a report of UNMOVIC and IAEA assessing the progress made
in completing the tasks shall be submitted by the inspectors
120 days after the adoption of the program of work according
to resolution 1284;
- at any time, according to paragraph 11 of resolution 1441,
the executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director General of
the IAEA shall report immediately to the Council any interference
by Iraq with inspections activities as well as failure by Iraq
to comply with its disarmament obligations;
- at any time, additional meetings of the Security Council
could be decided, including at high level.
To render possible a peaceful solution inspections should be
given the necessary time and resources. However, they can not continue
indefinitely. Iraq must disarm. Its full and active co-operation
is necessary. This must include the provision of all the additional
and specific information on issues raised by the inspectors as well
as compliance with their requests, as expressed in particular in
Mr. Blix letter of February 21st 2003. The combination of
a clear program of action, reinforced inspections, a clear timeline
and the military build-up provide a realistic means to reunite the
Security Council and to exert maximum pressure on Iraq.
Source: Permanent Mission of France to the United Nations
|